The ADA’s take on Sugar

Comments

One response to “The ADA’s take on Sugar”

1. 

   May 20, 2005

   AmyT

   Kathleen,
   I noticed you have comments disabled for your “Stand by my Stand” post on the ADA-Cadbury alliance.
   Obviously, I disagree. I do think you have to “look a gift horse in the mouth” sometimes if ethics, hypocrisy, and/or dangerous messages are at stake.
   Of course Cadbury also makes some “good” products. That is not the issue. On the whole, they represent the companies that are fostering BAD HEALTH with their aggressive marketing of sugary, non-nutritious foods. I think we do well to question their motives here…
   Yes, it is good for the ADA to get an influx of money, but at what price?

   Reply